Joerg writes
:We take nearly aurochs-sized highland cattle and modern horses as our
:image of Gloranthan agriculture when even Charlemagne's cattle and horses
:were somewhere between 50% and 70% the size of today's breeds. (Bone
:findings don't lie...)
We?
I definitely see the Sartarites riding small shaggy horses (like the viking age norwegian ponies)
http://www.jaatalli.fi/laidun1.jpg
And the shaggy highland cattle are not all that big.
I've also seen very conflicting views on the whole "horses getting bigger" arguments. Doesn't seem to be a universally accepted thing. Anyway, the only big horses I think about for Glorantha are those that are used by the cataphracts in the West (and Carmania).
:Pre-roman times celtic tribes like the Heuneburg chieftains, or the lords
:of the great oppidum at modern Kelheim in Bavaria? Hardly any difference
:to Harald Blaatand of Denmark, except for the better ship-building
:technology of the latter.
:
:When it comes to Gloranthan ships, we take 16th century Mediterranean as
:our watermark...
No way. I can't imagine why one would want to do that, when the bronze / early iron age offers such a wealth of sea traditions to draw on. Foenecian, persian and greek navies for instance, and even the reed ships of ancient egypt. Much more interesting than yet another high medieval / early reneisance setting.
-Adept
Thinker, dreamer and adventurer Received on Wed 21 Jun 2006 - 14:37:02 EEST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed 18 Jul 2007 - 23:38:07 EEST