In message <20060703111606.46992.qmail@web51014.mail.yahoo.com> Simon Phipp writes:
> In Gloranthan terms, a 150m giant should probably have a 20-30m long
>baby (although I've never actually measured a newborn baby so I'm just
>guessing).
There's no reason why a giant baby has to be proportionally bigger than a normal baby. Indeed if you take similar RW animals which have large size differences, say breeds of dogs, you find newborn puppies are much closer in size. Bigger dogs just grow faster.
Which could also explain why Gonn Orta is relatively small, he's still a youngster in giant terms.
-- Donald Oddy http://www.grove.demon.co.uk/Received on Mon 03 Jul 2006 - 16:22:09 EEST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed 18 Jul 2007 - 23:38:04 EEST