In message <003401c69fc1$19209cb0$0200000a@malkhome02> "Malk Williams" writes:
>>> I think a matriarch will be inherently nurturing and inclusive and
>>> unlikely to penalise those who don't know their parents.
>
>> What sexist rubbish! Women are no more "inherently nuturing and
>> inclusive" then men. To the extent this happens in the RW it is
>> a result of cultural expectations.
>
>Yes, quite so. Men and women are actually functionally identical,
>and there are no differences between them. Anyone claiming that
>women have a monopoly on lactation, womb ownership and menstrual
>cycles are also talking utter cobblers. Damn those sexist cultural
>expectations!
>
>(OK, I don't think that Orlanth Umathi was exactly spot-on with his
>assertion either, but your riposte Donald, seems to me to be at least
>as sweeping a generalisation as his, possibly even more so).
-- Donald Oddy http://www.grove.demon.co.uk/Received on Wed 05 Jul 2006 - 16:05:02 EEST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed 18 Jul 2007 - 23:38:05 EEST