[Glorantha]Re: Glorantha digest, Vol 10 #49 - 5 msgs

From: Mikko Rintasaari <rintasaa_at_mail.student.oulu.fi>
Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2004 18:28:37 +0200 (EET)

> >The difference is that the RW priest would have no
> >defence. The Gloranthan priest could say "yeah?
> >Disbelieve *this*, then!" And shoot the guy, there and
> >then, with a lightning bolt from his hand (no, not
> >from some possibly random thundercloud), killing him.

This just proves the priest is a magician, it doesn't prove anything about the priests claimed god. Nobody disputes the existance of magic on Glorantha. It's like an earthling disputing the existance of fire.


--__--__-- Received on Sun 22 Feb 2004 - 06:57:04 EET

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun 04 Feb 2007 - 19:57:45 EET