Re: [Glorantha]Re Imperial Ranks

From: Alex Ferguson <>
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2004 01:21:39 +0100

I think Svech/Mart -in and I are broadly on the same page here, but we may still be tripping over one or two bits of terminology and semantics...

> The whole point of my post was to illustrate that offical ranks above
> regimental and below the general of an army (whatever he is called) do
> no formally exist in the Imperial army, why? Because for such a rank
> to exist there must also be a formalised operational body that
> warrants such a rank. There is no such body in the Imperial army.

But there do _seem_ to be some such, to a greater or lesser extent; what about your example of the first post, the Warlord/Army of Sartar, being subordinate/to a component of the Warlord/Army of Dragon Pass? (The second isn't an operational unit, is that the point?)

Or likewise, we have Jorkandros, subordinate to Fazzur, commanding a multi-regimental force during the initial siege of Whitewall. (The latter's command isn't formalised? Or, he isn't actually a Warlord? Which may amount to the same thing, I suppose.)

Or indeed, are you just saying they exist on a case by case basis (this hierarchy there; this one here, for the time being); but aren't systematised? In the sense of, a unit of type [blah] is [farble] sized, and consists of [foo] [bars]. (Which is indeed clearly not the case.)



To unsubscribe from the Glorantha Digest, send an "unsubscribe" command to, or visit Glorantha is a Trademark of Issaries Inc. With the exception of previously copyrighted material, unless specified otherwise all text in this digest is copyright by the author or authors, with rights granted to copy for personal use, to excerpt in reviews and replies, and to archive unchanged for electronic retrieval. -
Official WWW at Archives at

End of Glorantha Digest Received on Fri 20 Aug 2004 - 07:00:21 EEST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun 04 Feb 2007 - 19:57:54 EET