From: MSmylie@aol.com
Date: Tue 24 Oct 1995 - 20:15:13 EET
Hello all.
Just a couple of quick comments about some stuff on the Art of War in gd170
- -- I believe the author was Sandy P., though the message was tagged as
"owner-glorantha-digest" and the end of it cut off by my mail server (if it
was, in fact, Loren writing, I apologize for the misidentification -- it just
seemed like a Sandy post).
>They [the KoW] worship war gods, not cavalry gods.
Hmm, sorry, that was, in a sense, precisely the point I was trying to make; I
apologize if I was unclear. Part of the problem, I think, is that in
Glorantha the relationship between humans and horses is almost always defined
as a cultic one (outside of the West, that is, but then they're always kind
of the exception anyway), primarily in the cults of horseman gods (Hyalor,
etc.), so I tend to think of heavily-horse oriented war cultures as
possessing specific cults which formalize this relationship in some form or
another.
>The troll members
>of the KoW doubtless fight afoot. There may also be bands that are
>able to dismount to fight, though they normally travel on horseback
>(like the Vikings). I predict that after the KoW has fought good
>infantry, they'll start using more infantry of their own. Presumably
>the Jonatings have some worthwhile footmen, and the KoW may already
>be learning to dismount some men in every major fight (as the
>French learned to do after repeated defeats by the English foot).
This seems, on a certain level, to contradict to some extent your previous
comments on KoW tactics, in that siege operations (both offensive and
defensive) are almost exclusively carried out on foot. If the KoW is already
capable of constructing defense-in-depth fortifications and of mounting (no
pun intended) successful castle-cracking sieges, that seems to me to imply
they've already incorporated the concept of infantry operations (dragoons, if
nothing else) into their war theory. I agree with Kevin Rose, incidentally,
that your statements about the easy success of KoW siege operations seems a
little odd.
>Wild-eyed horsemen aren't as common to Western
>minds, but they existed, too. Think of Sioux warriors, crazed on
>hallucinogenic drugs and holy frenzy; or the French knights at
>Crecy, so hungry for blood that they trampled their own men and
>charged into battle immediately after completing a long and tiring
>march; or ululating Arab horsemen, certain that to die while slaying
>on behalf of the faith means immediate Paradise. This may help you
>in picturing a ferocious mounted berserk.
While the examples do help, my trouble with mounted berserks had more to do
with the nature of the spell Berserker, which, in creating a single-minded
obsession with killing and the attack, always seemed to me to imply that a
Berserker would have trouble controlling anything but the best-trained mounts
in the heat of battle. This is particularly true since almost all examples
of Berserks I've ever seen -- in published works and private play -- have
used two weapons, making use of the bridle increasingly difficult (I'm not
saying it's impossible, just -- IMO -- improbable, that a Berserker is going
to be busy controlling his mount with his knees while frothing at the mouth
and swinging twin bastard swords). RW berserks don't strike me as being
quite the same thing as Gloranthans under the influence of divine magic.
As a final note, I just wanted to second what Kevin Rose wrote about the
degree to which military culture is bound up with the culture that produces
it; Victor Hanson has written extensively, frex, about the growth of hoplite
tactics and ethos out of the farmer-citizen culture of the early polis and
has argued, quite convincingly IMO, that those tactics would have been
antithetical to kin-dominated cultures (or even aristocratic ones). Orlanthi
culture, frex, strikes me as emphasizing the individual, close kin and clan
to a degree that makes it unlikely they would produce disciplined infantry.
Just a few thoughts.
Mark
------------------------------
End of Glorantha Digest V2 #174
*******************************
RuneQuest is a trademark of Avalon Hill, and Glorantha is a trademark
of Chaosium. With the exception of previously copyrighted material,
unless specified otherwise all text in this digest is copyright by the
author or authors, with rights granted to copy for personal use, to
excerpt in reviews and replies, and to archive unchanged for
electronic retrieval.
Send electronic mail to Majordomo@hops.wharton.upenn.edu with "help"
in the body of the message for subscription information on this and
other mailing lists.
WWW material at http://hops.wharton.upenn.edu/~loren/rolegame.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : Fri 13 Jun 2003 - 16:27:39 EEST