From: Steven E. Barnes (akuma@best.com)
Date: Tue 19 Mar 1996 - 08:11:52 EET
> From: mr happy <ajbehan@tcd.ie>
>
> The bicameral thesis has another drawback it is about as compatible with
> Uncle Joe (Campbell) as chalk with cheese. However IMHO it is a more
> appropriate tool for dealing with Illumination than Zen etc.
> - -----------
Yeah, but it kind of takes the piss out of Illumination. "What's
the great secret?" "Well, all of you players are already
Illuminated". Anyway, I thought Campbell was denounced as a
God-Learner by true Greg-ites.
> From: Bibishar@aol.com
>
> Having grown up in and around Washington, D.C., I thought I knew what
> "bicameral" means. But Mr. Barnes' comments made me wonder, so I looked up
> the word "bicameral" in my American Heritage Dictionary
'S ok... I don't even know what etic and emic mean. I tried looking
them up in a friends massive dictionary, and they weren't listed.
- -steve (not the SF writer)
------------------------------
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : Fri 13 Jun 2003 - 16:29:59 EEST