From: MSmylie@aol.com
Date: Mon 22 Apr 1996 - 19:29:27 EEST
Hello all.
As Loren has fired warning flares over the Esrolian military thread, I'll try
and keep this short and sweet.
Martin Laurie objected to two aspects of my last post. First, I mentioned
the difference in statistical rolls precisely to _remind_ Martin that some of
us don't play that way, and I believe that was the only comment I made on
that particular aspect of his argument (in fact, I have to admit that at
least in the gaming circles I travel in, it has been long-standing policy to
ignore gender-based differences in human characteristic rolls, most certainly
for PCs and generally for NPCs as well; I would, I suppose, be curious to
find out if Martin enforces gender-based rolls for his female players, but
that might be best answered in private email). Having sparred RW women
before (Tae Kwon Do in my case, not Muay Tai), I am well aware of gender
differences in fighting style and ability; however, I am also aware that RW
social (and physical) conditioning plays a material part in those
differences, so when we're talking about a fictional matriarchy that has
existed since (hmm; before?) the Dawn I would argue it's necessary to rethink
our predispositions. 1600+ years of matriarchal culture is bound to produce
a slightly different cultural norm. This was, I think, also the point behind
Ian's (tongue-in-cheek?) comment about "75% of Esrolian women are stronger
than the top 25% of Esrolian men."
Secondly, yes, this is obviously an open discussion group, and I don't
believe that at any point I suggested that Martin _not_ air his views; the
fact that this is an open discussion group does not, AFAIK, prevent me or
anyone else from expressing criticism on a poster's tone, language, or ideas,
and I thought the term "distasteful" a reasonably polite one. As my comments
should have revealed, I tended to agree with Martin about the degree of skill
and training available to Esrolian men, though like Peter I find Babeester
Gor a perfectly attractive cult for young women in Esrolia and think women
play a key, if not the key, role in Esrolia's defense. Martin summons the
accusatory spirit of Political Correctness (sigh), and I would only say that
I find it as unnecessary to work the term "snotty bitches" into a discussion
of Esrolian military tactics as I would the term "sheep fucking hill-billies"
into a discussion of Orlanthi ones.
As a quick note, I tend to think of the Lunar defeat at the Building Wall
Battle as a bit more sweeping than Andrew Joelson does -- why else would the
Lunars bother to conquer the incredibly poor terrain of the Prax over the
riches of Esrolia? Not even the dismemberment of the Pharoah by the Razoress
was enough to tempt the Lunars into Esrolia proper, until they had folks on
the inside; that said, the "bayonet probe" theory works just as well. Thanks
to Peter Metcalfe for reminding me that Jeff Richards came up with the
trollkin militia parallel, and for mentioning the Seshnelan Serpent
connection (everybody sing "Don't know much about Seshnelan history"). I
will agree to disagree with Peter about the military/defender role of consort
cults in Esrolia, and leave it at that.
Your Glorantha May Vary, a lot. Hopefully relurking before this becomes
KoW2,
Mark
------------------------------
End of Glorantha Digest V2 #494
*******************************
RuneQuest is a trademark of Avalon Hill, and Glorantha is a trademark
of Chaosium. With the exception of previously copyrighted material,
unless specified otherwise all text in this digest is copyright by the
author or authors, with rights granted to copy for personal use, to
excerpt in reviews and replies, and to archive unchanged for
electronic retrieval.
Send electronic mail to Majordomo@hops.wharton.upenn.edu with "help"
in the body of the message for subscription information on this and
other mailing lists.
WWW material at http://hops.wharton.upenn.edu/~loren/rolegame.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : Fri 13 Jun 2003 - 16:30:41 EEST