From: ANDOVER@delphi.com
Date: Thu 04 Jul 1996 - 02:41:11 EEST
It seems to me that the arguments about the nature of Glorantha are
a bit more subtle than Berkeleyism, but are rather closer to the
Copenhagen theory of quantum reality: that what you see depends upon
what questions you ask of reality.
I do not think myself that the Gods are subjective -- I like the idea that
However, you could no more worship Humakt as the God of love than you
they are like the Gods of Tekumel -- so far beyond the perceptions of their
worshippers that ANY view of them is necessarily limited.
could Sarku. But you could find a way to worship him as an intellectual
God, frex, by using Death as Separation and Truth as his goal -- Humakt
as the God of new intellectual paradigms! (or as the God of revolutionary
intellectuals?)
So, I believe that there are lots of new ways to worship a God that have
not yet been discovered, but that there are limits to the type of worship
or discoveries that can be made about any God. Chalana Arroy and Zorak
Zoran will never overlap!
Jim Chapin
------------------------------
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : Fri 13 Jun 2003 - 16:51:20 EEST