From: D M McNamara (D.M.McNamara@durham.ac.uk)
Date: Fri 09 Aug 1996 - 12:24:39 EEST
I thought the descriptions of blue vadeli sexuality were most thought
provoking - utterly repulsive and abhorrent, but then i guess the
descriptions worked as they ought to....I do agree, however, that more
effective horror is 'implied' rather than having gut-wrenching
splatterfests (see any 1980's horror film, which often stretched
unsubtlety to its limits - i always thought bela lugosi in a cloak was
scarier). See Lovecraft's 'supernatural horror in literature' for a fine
analysis.
Some critics claim 'this sort of horror (blue vadeli) is unsubtle and
hence ineffective.' Well, to this i would draw your attention to the
supposed master of subtlety, Lovecraft......when you think about it, most
of his horror techniques were often infact based on a subtext of fear of
sexuality, women and bestiality ('the unknown,' 'flabby tentacles and
appendages''being consumed'). I don't really want to exhaustively qualify
this, but if you want to find out more, then read Moorcock's essay on
fantasy literature (in 'the opium general' i think). However, i do agree
that Barker-style horror is largely puerile, because it often builds on
our own fear of the sanctity of the body. Lovecraft was far more
effective, as his horror was based on a *subtext* (albeit one he was not
fully aware of) - therefore rather than having machetes waved in peoples
faces and bodies being cut up, he played on our own frustrations......the
profound feeling of disturbance and queasiness that one feels when
reading lovecraft is because of this. This is why modern cthulhu horror
fails (see any of the chaosium collections for a case in point), because
it is unable to keep its narrative techniques in the closet, and
therefore ultimately comes out being unsubtle, childish and superficial.
Indeed, modern cthulhu fiction is often 'postmodern' in this sense, in
that it is unable to keep its subtext hidden - it has to be dragged
kicking and screaming into daylight (whereas in the best modernist
fiction, the subtext, and the author, is hiding).
Anyway, what i am trying to say is that whereas i felt the blue vadeli
antics were unsubtle - the fact that they played on sexuality was not
wrong, because it is a horror technique applied by all the greatest
masters of horror - Bloch, Lovecraft, Stoker. Indeed, the act itself of
the blue vadeli is not totally wrong - but i don't think the pc's should
know about it (i think hearing despairing screams in the night is
better).
As for the stuff about menstruation taboos, it can be found in a great
many societies. I would not suggest that it is a feature unique to all
societies - but because it is such a curious and wondrous occurance
(spontaneous bleeding from genitals), it often acquires great symbolic
significance and is invested with ideology.
I do not think it is a uniquely 'western' belief either. Many
hunter-gatherers in africa (eg. baka pygmy, the hadza, etc.) have these
kind of taboos - no menstruating woman shall cross the path of a beast
being hunted, for example. In Papua new Guinea too, in the sepik river
valley, there are extensive menstruation taboos associated with yam
growing. No woman shall plant seeds or walk in a plot where yams are
growing, or their 'bad magic' will poison the yams. The yams are treated
like people - in festivals, mighty yams are dressed in fine ceremonial
clothing, and paraded round the villages. At night, the farmers visit the
yams where they are growing, and tell stories to them so that they don't
get bored. Menstruating women must stay away, though.
As for the blue vadeli beliefs on sexuality, they are not that
strange when considered in a RW context. Once more, in papua new guinea,
one tribe does not consider a child to have become a man until they have
(ahem) fellated a priest. This is because semen is considered to be a
life force, held within priests, but this life force can be given to
adolescents to make them become adults (as the semen is taken into their
bodies) - before this ritual act, they are not considered to have a soul,
and if someone dies before receiving their soul, they are buried with
great fear, as they will probably come back as a ghost.
In some areas of papua new guinea in the 19th cent, cannibalism and
necrophilia was common (albeit supported by appropriate ritual belief).
The male-female sexual act was one filled with great significance - the
woman was seen as 'eating' the man (as she ate his semen, his life
force), and gained power over him via this. Many stories said that women
had the power to turn into dogs at night, and that they went among the
grave plots to dig up men's corpses and eat them - as they did in life
symbolically. Of course, this never happened (at least i hope not!), they
were just stories, However, anthropologists did record that women did eat
some of the corpse of a dead relative when he died. Similarly, in ireland
(pre 19th cent), some women used to taste the blood of a male relative who
had died. If you want to find out more, i suggest you read bloch and
parry's 'death and the regeneration of life' (1981 i think, cambridge uni
press).
One Durkheimian interpretation of these gross acts is that death, or
the coming of age, holds great symbolic significance, which potentially
may rupture a community. Therefore people create these rituals to
reestablish social relations, to create society anew.
i hope these examples illustrate that truth is sometimes as strange as
fiction, so the blue vadeli rituals are not totally wrong (as they merely
offend my bourgeois sensibilities, because i am imperfect). I do feel,
however, that they ought to be supported with some ritual colouring. I
would suggest something akin to the papua new ginea rites. I can't think
of any gods or legends which could be associated with this though, as my
knowledge of the vadeli is woefully inadequate. Can anyone else help?
Dominic.
------------------------------
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : Fri 13 Jun 2003 - 16:52:06 EEST