From: Joerg Baumgartner (joe@toppoint.de)
Date: Wed 04 Sep 1996 - 23:28:00 EEST
Sandy Petersen
>The debate goes on vs. Shamans and Sorcerers.
> For what it's worth, I'm continuing this discussion NOT in
>order to prove to Joerg the error of his ways,
That is not only, I suppose...
>but also because I
>think it is interesting and useful (at least to me) to hammer out
>whether a shaman actually _is_ better than a sorcerer at handling
>spirits. Joerg has usefully taken the Devil's Advocate position.
Baumgartner, Dayzatar and the Bat - we defended Wakboth at the Ritual of the
Net...
>1) Even a lengthy discorporation ritual is superior to the
>sorcerer's ability in this regard -- i.e., nothing. If a spirit's
>hiding, the sorcerer can do little. The shaman can hunt it down on
>its own turf.
The powerful sorcerer (i.e. one equivalent to a shaman with own POW + fetch
POW in the high 30s) worth his salt will summon (in fact, release) some
useful spirit and let it do the job. I admit that the shaman has the same
option.
The discorporation as the _only_ suitable method for a shaman (or, in fact,
I don't think that the shaman can effectively hunt down a spirit which
anybody) to exorcise a spirit is something that has bugged me for some time.
It doesn't feel right.
sticks to the mundane plane. Too many border effects are there to hide the
spirit. IMO the most usual trick is to ambush the spirit when it returns
from the mundane plane into its spirit plane lair, something less effective
against bound spirits haunting a specific locale or area. The usual way to
deal with such spirits is to remove either the binding, or the cause for it.
> 2) If the shaman wins a spirit combat, bringing a spirit's
>MPs to 0, he can bind it into his fetch or a magic item, whether he's
>corporate or not. He doesn't even need a Control spell.
Great. Really useful. Does the spirit regain its MP? If it does, then this
is a somewhat nice feature. I'd purchase "Control <spirit species likely to
attack in spirit combat>" plus "<...> Binding" matrices then, if I were to
enter spirit-haunts. If I happen to win the spirit combat, I should have
that MP to spare.
Anyway, I tend to play spirits like animals (spirits which can attack like
carnivores) or even like sapients. This means that only a sapient or
extremely desperate spirit will attack a shaman when there are so many weak
prey souls in the flock. Does the wolf attack the shepherd or his dog when
all he wants are sheep?
Of course, the shaman and his fetch will stand out on the spirit plane like
the shepherd's fire in the night. Spirits of prey will be attracted, hover
shyly around, and yet leave the shaman alone. (That is spirits which want to
feed on an entire soul/possess a body. Spirits which just want to have a
small nibble at some spiritual blood, like mosquitoes, might well attack the
shaman. They might even get away with it...)
> 3) A spirit cannot break off combat unless it has 10 MPs more
>than the shaman, so a losing spirit isn't going anywhere. But a
>Protective Circle keeps a spirit from getting at the sorcerer at all
>(if it works), so a spirit who fails is still free to flee.
Here the rules get fuzzy as well as unsatisfactory. The same spirit cannot
What about magical protection against spirit attacks (provided from outside
Anyway, I suppose that the sorcerer's approach to spirits is "catch a thief
break off spirit combat with any embodied entity unless it has 10 MPs more
than its victim, or the victim has zero MP?
sources, that is): will this be a sufficient reason for a spirit to break
off its attack when the protection makes all attacks futile?
with a thief". Get some spirit plane entity (why not one of the saints or
even angelic beings of the Malkioni pantheon - yes, there are such) and set
it to the job. I bet that this is a standard shaman practice, too, and more
so for priests.
Malkionism is not that different from theist religions. There are traditions
which have been suppressed by the early God Learners, but re-discovered by
later ones, which knew exactly how to deal with the major and minor spirits
of the land or whatever power there was. In fact the 1st Age wizard was the
magician most likely able to deal with any deity or spirit there was,
because of his lack of allegiance to one of the specialized powers. Trust a
darkness priest to be better at handling shadows or Dehori, but stick with
the (1st Age) sorcerer when it gets to handle all the other spirits,
elementals or whatever.
Shamans rarely are that universal in their approach. In fact, most shamans
are culturally limited to interact with the spirits they know. This will
include enemy spirits they know (like the Praxian crack tribal shamans can
eliminate chaos beasties), but they will be at a loss when unknown stuff
comes. At least that's how it should be, IMO.
I know that the shaman has to face the unknowable, and survive it - that's
I say that a sorcerer entering the ruins of a foreign culture (say the Big
what the Bad Man combat is about. (And what a lousy game mechanic it has...
this ought to be one of the first things on the to-do list for Glorantha:
The Game.) However, all of this still remains within his culture, within his
culture's array of unknowables. It still doesn't enable the shaman to
overcome the unknowable, or to stand it off when it comes to territorial
claims (like possessed bodies), the shaman only gains the insight(?)
experience(?) illumination(?) to deal with it.
Rubble) _should be_ better able to fend off haunting spirits than a shaman
entering the ruins of a foreign culture (in this case any shaman but Praxian
and troll ones, to whom Pavis was a known enemy culture), simply because the
sorcerer is less preoccupied with cultural taboos and superstitions wrt
these entities.
------------------------------
End of Glorantha Digest V3 #171
*******************************
RuneQuest is a trademark of Avalon Hill, and Glorantha is a trademark
of Chaosium. With the exception of previously copyrighted material,
unless specified otherwise all text in this digest is copyright by the
author or authors, with rights granted to copy for personal use, to
excerpt in reviews and replies, and to archive unchanged for
electronic retrieval.
Send electronic mail to Majordomo@hops.wharton.upenn.edu with "help"
in the body of the message for subscription information on this and
other mailing lists.
WWW material at http://hops.wharton.upenn.edu/~loren/rolegame.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : Fri 13 Jun 2003 - 16:52:41 EEST