From: Erik Hamilton (ham@queeg.com)
Date: Tue 04 Mar 1997 - 23:38:19 EET
It's time to opine:
Unless we're consigning Joseph Campbell to a death below the waves of
the Homeward Ocean, I feel that we can never wholly discount the
monomyth. Just because the Jrusteli constructed monomyth does not hold
does not mean that the idea is flawed per se. The Jrusteli were guilty
of supreme hubris, and their vision therefore was muddied with their
own preconceptions. Personally I feel that the Red Goddess has her
head up her hinder, but that does not mean I believe her ideas are
intrinsically flawed, only their application. Same with the God
Learners and their quest for the monomyth.
I envision the Gods as being like huge ethereal diamonds. They are
beautiful, and they have seemingly limitless facets. Every face, when
peered into, reveals different tricks of the light, a different name, a
different history, different spells and heirarchies. Each facet
reveals different relationships with every other diamond. Yelmalio and
Elmal can very easily be the very same diamond, with their followers
each gazing into the crystal from opposite sides. Only he knows what
his real name is, and he's not telling anyone. Each subjective
perspective reveals something different about the objective reality of
the God. Every Trickster shrine teaches a different spell because
every one reveres some slightly different aspect of the God's
totality. It is conceivable that there is only one Trickster, and
the myriad names and personalities the Trickster takes to himself, be
he Bolongo, Eurmal, or Don Quixote are all different sides to the same
God. While Trickster priests understand this, Sun Domers do not, and
so my nice happy Eurmali can find a shrine to his God across the whole
world, while the unyielding Yelmalions see only the one facet, and
cannot reap the benefits of the others.
It's akin to the old parable of the five blind men and the elephant,
where one feels the trunk and declares the elephant to be like unto a
vine, while another feels the elephant's side and says it is very like
a wall, and another, holding the ear, protests the elephant is much
akin to a sail. Well Orlanth Rex is the trunk, Orlanth Adventurous is
the ear, Orlanth Thunderous is the tusk, Worlath is the tuft at the
end of the tail, Orland is the eyelid, Invisible Orlanth is the skin
behind the left front knee, etc. Furthermore, we're all very blind.
In the end what we believe is moot. It doesn't matter what we know to
be true. If Yu-Kargzant is only the Sun's Servant to the Dara Happoi
does not prevent a Pentan Kahn from receiving His blessings. And if it
works for him, then it's real, and there is nothing subjective about
that.
Okay, I'm done.
Erik Hamilton
------------------------------
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : Fri 13 Jun 2003 - 16:57:51 EEST