From: Smith & Jones (oj@maths.anu.edu.au)
Date: Sun 24 Aug 1997 - 22:37:39 EEST
Responding to Nick Brooke:
- --------------------------
> > It has been suggested that bats began as birds, and were changed
> > when they aligned with the dark. Given the primal dark came
> > first, before fiery Yelm, surely it was the other way around?
>
> Er ... why? <snip> your argument makes little sense.
Bats in the belfry eh? Birds from bats makes about as much sense as
bats from birds, I would have thought. More so if you're a troll, as
Steve Martin suggested. In any case, given bats fly in the dark
(rather than the air), I see no reason why you couldn't have bats
flitting about before the air, fire and other younger elements
appeared.
Cheers
Owen Jones
------------------------------
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : Fri 13 Jun 2003 - 20:53:13 EEST