From: Sandy Petersen (SPetersen@ensemblestudios.com)
Date: Fri 07 Nov 1997 - 02:23:04 EET
>If we're comparing the relative effectiveness of warriors in different
cults, then they should be compared in similar >situations; a BG
priestess is no more helpless than a Humakt Sword or ZZ Deathlord when
ganged up on.
Yes she is, because her spells tend to be useful only when
boosted to high levels. Humakti & ZZ don't rely on their subordinates
for their fighting prowess. Therefore, a BG priestess tends to have much
weaker assistants than the Humakti or ZZ - hers have had to learn
Mindlink, give her their Slashes, spend their MPs on her behalf, etc.
Her cult emphasizes a focus on an individual with great powers,
while Humakt, ZZ, & Storm Bull rely on a mass of skilled warriors.
Comparing them one-on-one is as unfair as comparing a Chalana
Arroy priestess to an Eiritha cultist.
>if you insist on comparing one vs. five, how about a BG preistess with
8d6 Axe attack vs. one Humakt Sword >with five uses of Truesword?
The one Humakti Sword casts his 5 Trueswords on each of 5
different swords. 1 pt of Truesword is absolutely superior to 1 pt of
Slash. If you face a situation where numbers are useful, the Sword is
better. If you are in a position that a single person is more useful,
then the BG priestess has a significant edge.
George gets down to the bottom line:
>Anything that another cult can do, Babs can do as well.
Storm Khans have access to sylphs, which are more valuable than
gnomes for most purposes. Storm Khans are better against chaos. Storm
Khans get access to special magic spirits more easily than BG does.
(Here I'm referring to the Heart of the Bull, Hooves of the Bull,
Testicles of the Bull, etc.) Also, the allied cults of the Khans are
superior to those of BG in many ways.
Deathlords get good attack spells (Fear, Sever Spirit, frex)
plus the dynamite Seal Wound spell.
Orlanthi have an extremely fine spell array (Teleport,
Thunderstone, Lightning, Darkwalk, etc.) and a host of terrific allies -
the only cults comparable to Orlanth in the quality and variety of
allied cults are Yelm and Pamalt; with the Red Goddess a runner-up.
Humakti get gifts, which can be a significant bonus so long as
no one takes advantage of a geas. They're better against undead, and
can't get turned into Undead. They have a cool attack spell (Sever
Spirit). They have numerous defenses against treachery (Oath, Detect
Wachaza has good attack spells and access to two types of
Golden Bow kicks butt. Two-handed axe wielders tend to be
infantry. My money's on the horse archers.
Seven Mothers gets help from chaos, has excellent attack spells,
and tend to be reinforced by the "third most skilled magicians in
Glorantha" (after the Malkioni & Kralori).
Babeester Gor has no attack spells, weak allied cults (insofar as combat
goes, that is), are very specialized and rare, and tend to be heavily
under the thumb of a bunch of pacifistic earth priestesses.
I like BG a lot, but I consider her one of the _less_ flexible cults in
Glorantha, not one of the most. If you're going on a combat-only mission
in which you plan to fight humanoids, I would say that she is one of the
finest religions to have on your side. But anything else and she's
somewhat out of her element.
SLASHES & CRUSHES
The RQ2 Slash will not work properly in RQ3. You see, the slash
is supposed to be inferior to the impale, and the impale was itself
lessened in RQ3. In fact, the RQ3 impale is identical to the RQ2 slash.
My campaign treats a slash as "maximum weapon damage" not
counting damage bonus. It counts a crush as "maximum damage bonus". If
you have no damage bonus, I add 1 to the damage done so you get
something. If you have a negative damage bonus, then of course Crush is
useful for you (since it's never worse than -1).
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : Fri 13 Jun 2003 - 21:41:06 EEST