Knight Fort - a many-splendoured thing

From: Maria or Michael (michael.raaterova.7033@student.uu.se)
Date: Thu 05 Feb 1998 - 11:15:17 EET


Jeff Richard:

>Increasingly, I believe that Knight Fort was originally a Jrusteli
>fortification of the Second Age, not a Third Age construction by the
>Merchant Barons/Princes of Wenelia, not a EWF construction and not a tomb
>to the unknown soldier.

Jeff, Knight Fort can be all of those things and more too. It doesn't have
to be a *single* thing - it has been used by lots of groups and people over
the years, all of whom can claim the rightful ancestry and origins of
Knight Fort.

Michael Raaterova

<.sig omitted on legal advice>

------------------------------


This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : Fri 13 Jun 2003 - 23:06:46 EEST