From: Simon Bray (email@example.com)
Date: Wed 06 May 1998 - 11:37:54 EEST
I am really enjoying the way everybody utilises the King of Sartar (etc.).
It amazes me how when people want its contents to be accurate, true and
supportive of their statements then it is! On the other hand if they want
to disagree with you then they wear the other boot and claim that the King
of Sartar (etc) is biased, incorrect and cannot be used as a reasonable
You know you would think that the damn thing was a bible or somthing!!
People can argue point of minutae for an eternity and will never resolve
their problems. The reality is that we all know that Greg writes with
constant inconsistency, even recreating whole chunks of Glorantha to fit
his thinking. I personally do not believe that Glorantha lives in its
history, but instead in its mythology.
Right! now that is over, will somebody actually tell me what has been
learned during the recent Grazer debate? What was the actual starting
point of the argument? Where is it going or will it simply be another over
extended melee of quotations, referencing and word play? Will all this slip
off into the dark night of private e-mail?
The function of the Digest as I have alwasys perceived it is to look at
creative developments within Glorantha. I am more than happy to discover
that long debates on the Digest will eventually become published articles,
although this rarely happens! What are everybody's agendas in regards to
these lengthy debates?
Finally, I have come to know you all as friends and comrades, even though
I have not met many of you face to face. However why is it that the main
protagonists always remain the same? Pete Mecalfe, I really like you but
you are becoming like a cannon that fires quotations. A lot of people
respect what you say, but often it is 'Your' Gloranthan concepts that are
being put forward as 'official'. I must say that some of them are cracking
good ideas and I adopt them readily, but you do have a tendency to take on
an official heir. Joerg Baumgartner, you too are like rocket launcher of
quotations +5. I respect the writings that you produce, but they are
becoming verbose. On more than one occasions a whole digest has consisted
of your ideas, quotations and paraphrasing. I don't even look at them
anymore, they blind me.
I will probably get flamed by these comments, I do not care. Their
intention is not to offend but to make a comment. I do not wish to see good
debates disappear from the Digest, just become more readable, less
aggressive and have some indication of their final purpose eg: A summary of
thoughts, an indication that the findings may appear in a future
publication or somebody independent corrolating the arguments into somthing
readable and usable by players, artists and writers.
He who increases knowledge, increases sorrow.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : Fri 13 Jun 2003 - 23:16:47 EEST