Malkionism and Boddhisvattvas

From: Peter Metcalfe (metcalph@voyager.co.nz)
Date: Wed 13 May 1998 - 15:04:04 EEST


Nils Weinander:

[on why we should use the Boddhisvattva parallel]

>* Whether you look at grammmar or religion or anything else
> which has evolved over a long time, large area and/or
> from multiple sources, it is rarely that nice and simple
> and free from exceptions and aberrations.

But in every case that I've seen so far, the Boddhisvattva
parallel was presented as some universal truth about Malkioni
Saints. This is what annoys me.

[My theory on Malkioni Solace described]

>This is a longer step from the published information
>about Solace, and more hairsplitting since it posits
>simultaneous existence in and out of Solace, but I am
>sure there is potential for cool stuff here.

Simultaneous existance is not unusual as there are living
Saints (ie in Solace and on Earth) in Glorantha. Gerlant
before he died was worshipped as a Saint and the Malkioni
Freeform had a Living Saint called Notslor attending.

- --Peter Metcalfe

------------------------------


This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : Fri 13 Jun 2003 - 23:17:17 EEST