From: Alex Ferguson (abf@cs.ucc.ie)
Date: Wed 05 Aug 1998 - 03:02:47 EEST
David Dunham replies to George Harris:
> As I posted some time ago, Hero Wars is a paradigm shift from
> RuneQuest -- Hero Wars doesn't model processes. Your message
> describes this fairly well. Given that it's difficult to communicate
> across a paradigm shift (there's often an "aha!" moment where
> suddenly you understand all),
I doubt that that'll help the Deep Immersion Method Roleplayers much,
and I know it still doesn't mean anything to _me_, and I have played
the game (a whole once). One could take the above as implying that
anyone criticising HW merely hasn't understood it yet, which would be
unfortunate (and wrong to boot).
I think a more useful approach is that although HW resolution is indeed
Jolly Abstract, it needn't play that way -- that's part of what the
optional combat rules seem to do, and one could extend the same principle
elsewhere. How "concrete" you get about what an AP "really means" in
game world terms seems to be something where there's a lot of useful
latitude. In fact, it'd be nice if the (final version of) the rulebook
contains "sample AP values" for a reasonably large number of keywords,
just to help get a "feel" for what they (might) represent in game terms.
Ultimately, of course, it falls upon the GM to "manage" AP's in a way
the players are comfortable with -- if that means them describing their
characters' actions, and the ref doing all the conversion to AP values,
then surely that will work too.
> I think you should try the game before deciding.
I'll agree with that, though.
Slainte,
Alex.
------------------------------
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : Fri 13 Jun 2003 - 17:15:48 EEST