From: David Lucas (david.lucas@dial.pipex.com)
Date: Wed 21 Apr 1999 - 19:03:26 EEST
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
- ------=_NextPart_000_0001_01BE8C18.DF5D73E0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
The discussion of Chaos causes new writer to unlurk...letting in disorder
from outside the Digest...that's what happens when you even just talk about
Chaos.
[Lots of quotes removed...]
I will seek to clarify the issues that need resolving in the "Chaos" thread.
And no doubt trigger accidental flame-war (96-00 on Placate/Clarify)
I would suggest that it does not progress debate to argue over the meaning
of words. Words (a la Humpty Dumpty) need to be defined, even if multiple
meanings are acknowledged. To seek a "true nature of Chaos" at a
cosmological level is a God-learner project, and futile.
But the physics of chaos does need to be sorted out - since that will
specify the *phenomena* that different people will then interpret
differently. Along with magic and spirits, chaos seems to be a part of the
physics of Glorantha and has therefore some definite phenomenology (whatever
that might be).
The Gloranthan physics of Chaos
It is necessary to agree as Gloranthan lore what Chaos (or whatever names
- -------------------------------
you call it) looks like. What triggers the Stormbull Sense Chaos and when?
When does Bill grow a tentacle? We need this shared base of fact, which is
what different cultures respond to in forming their attitudes. Of course
some cultures may not have experienced some aspects of Chaos (and what fun
when they meet it!).
Whether someone can "really" be cleansed of Chaos is a God-learner question
of no import. Whether mainstream Orlanthi *believe* you can be is an
important social question. Whether there are circumstance where trusted
indicators (e.g. showing up on Sense Chaos) cease to detect you is a matter
of physics. Obviously Gloranthans will not know the 'real' physics, but if
written pedantically the physics need not violate any reasonable world view.
These questions of physics arise whatever your atttitude towards Chaos.
The single biggest issue is what Sense Chaos senses, since it seems to imply
an objective definition. D&D Alignment by the back door. I tend to assume
that (post-Compromise) there is a background level of chaos at a low level,
with some random variation. And it is biased towards "Detecting things that
Storm Bull does not like, or does not understand" and anyway gives quite a
few false positives (that background chaos again). But I just wish it
weren't there. If ever something needed Gregging.
Gloranthan social attitudes towards chaos
- -----------------------------------------
These can diverge (as per the "cleansing" debate). There is no need for
peoples views to be consistent SO LONG AS THE ACTUAL PHENOMENA CORRESPOND
SUFFICIENTLY. The trick will be to make the various social views both
plausible and well integrated.
We can develop various culture's 'Chaosologies' in immense detail if so
desired, But it is the everyman's thoughts, feelings, conversations and
institutions that interest me, and which can be subtle without being
sophisticated. IMO, the Orlanthi view should be closed to argument -
questioning it is a sign of chaos-taint - so I like the direction the
Arroy/Malia comments went.
The characters personal experience of Chaos
- -------------------------------------------
Just as a society can change, so can an individual. We may bring an Orlanthi
to ambivalence about chaos, although I feel it unlikely. The player may not
believe in objective cosmic evil, but the character does. He has met it. An
Orlanthi sees not "ambiguity" but seduction and deceit. The human cost of
fighting the good fight can be horrific. They must be resolute.
And what about Lunar culture. What is their view of "Chaotically Modified
Organisms" (CGOs). How about running scenarios for Lunars there they start
to wonder if in fact there is an objectively evil unity to Chaos.
And, what is the experience of chaos-taint like? There will be culturally
relative reactions but also but is there more? Do you feel new unknown
emotions that reshape a personality? Is the world somehow seen as if in a
different light?
Nature, or whatever
- -------------------
Hibbs & Conrad said:
Ping
> because it wasn't part of Glorantha as originally created.
Pong
> they grew from, or were created from the stuff of Glorantha itself. Storm
was born
> from earth and sky and so is natural. ... you also have to accept Chaos
as natural.
Ping
> Chaos intrudes into the world from outside it and so is unnatural. It's a
very simple distinction.
etc.
There is no *natural* definition of 'natural'. There can be many different
meanings of natural in many different Gloranthan languages (if they
translate ;-) ). Set down a definition and then we can agree on the
conclusion. But probably not on the definition.
What is the consequence (and therefore importance) of the debate? Is the
motivating question whether Chaos is objectively evil, or objectively
morally neutral. Plague on you God-learners. The Orlanthi know that chaos is
objectively evil, the Lunars know otherwise. End of discussion. Start of
fight.
- ------=_NextPart_000_0001_01BE8C18.DF5D73E0
Content-Type: text/x-vcard;
name="David Lucas.vcf"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: attachment;
filename="David Lucas.vcf"
BEGIN:VCARD
VERSION:2.1
N:Lucas;David
FN:David Lucas
EMAIL;PREF;INTERNET:david.lucas@dial.pipex.com
REV:19990421T103557Z
END:VCARD
- ------=_NextPart_000_0001_01BE8C18.DF5D73E0--
------------------------------
End of The Glorantha Digest V6 #542
***********************************
To unsubscribe from the Glorantha Digest, send an "unsubscribe"
command to glorantha-digest-request@chaosium.com. Glorantha is a
Trademark of Issaries Inc. With the exception of previously
copyrighted material, unless specified otherwise all text in this
digest is copyright by the author or authors, with rights granted to
copy for personal use, to excerpt in reviews and replies, and to
archive unchanged for electronic retrieval.
Official WWW at http://www.glorantha.com
Archives at http://rider.wharton.upenn.edu/~loren/rolegame.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : Fri 13 Jun 2003 - 19:50:46 EEST