From: Alex Ferguson (abf@yeats.ucc.ie)
Date: Wed 26 Jan 2000 - 05:48:05 EET
TTrotsky:
> I did raise this point
> briefly with Greg once, and he seemed not to be very clear about what the
> term 'atheist' actually meant, and hinted that most sorcerers might not
> actually be atheists in the sense of 'people who don't believe in God'.
Well, to return briefly to the Brithini: They believe in a 'Creator', in
> Their magic doesn't come from God but (aside, perhaps, from the Brithini
some sense, but don't believe it's possible/meaningful/morally correct to
attempt to 'worship' this entity as such. One could be trite and say this
would be like a theoretical cosmologist worshipping the Big Bang... One
can see some 'Malkioni sorcerors' believing much the same, or some
intermediate point between that and 'orthodox' Malkionism.
> or other such 'outsider' groups) that doesn't necessarily mean they deny
> His existence.
But 'mainstream' Malkioni magic doesn't come from God either, other
than in an indirect and rather philosophical sense. (Assorted forms
of saint worship I may have to grant you...) Wizardry/sorcery comes
from an understanding of His creation, not by a special Act of God.
> it would be fairly surprising - at least to me - if there aren't
> any deists in it anywhere. As a philosophy, it goes back to ancient Greece,
> after all...
Pretty much the attitude of God Forgot, no?
> Certainly it appears unnecessary for groups such as the Orlanthi,
> Praxians, etc. Who needs faith when you're transported to the God Plane every
> holy day?
One might be tempted to think that 'faith' was either the precondition
to such experiences, and/or the result of having them, rather than
being exclusive with it. I believe that even in Glorantha, it's
possible to fail to have a religious experience when one is 'supposed'
to, or to have one, and fail to interpret in the 'correct' manner.
Cheers,
Alex.
------------------------------
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : Fri 13 Jun 2003 - 20:54:07 EEST