From: Alex Ferguson (abf@cs.ucc.ie)
Date: Fri 14 Apr 2000 - 04:40:06 EEST
Mikko Rintasaari:
> Oh don't get me started. I don't want the roman at all, I just like having
> the Lunar army more manouverable and flexible. I think a nice
> basic manouvering unit of the Red Armo would be a cohort of 70 men. Both
> for heavy infantry and auxia (apologies for the roman terminology). These
> units are of course trained to unite / separate / unite again as needs be.
I assumed you meant a rather larger sub-unit when you said cohort.
Yes, I think there are such sub-units (centuries, etc), though what
the 'correct doctrine' for their use is is another matter... If
you're suggesting this or that type of 'tactical drill' at such a
level, I can imagine that, though what said tactics would be is another
matter. I can imagine regiments like the Steel Swords having
wackier tactics than yer basic stand-in-neat-rows-please long-spear
heavy inf, for example. But I think using the components of a regiments
strategically independantly would at the least be very unusual, if not
outright unheard of.
> > > The place for the greek/macedonian model warfare is the purely solar
> > > cultures.
> >
> > Like for example, Dara Happa...
>
> Indeed. But I think most of the Dara Happan phalanxes aren't acually that
> deep, and are equipped with 1h-spear and shield, not the Sarissa. The Dara
> Happan phalanxes are heavily armored and fearsome though.
That'd make sense to me, with the Pelandan phalanx being the more
'classical' one. (Nevr mind that they're not a 'pure solar culture'.
Maybe the Sun Dome Templars are the bastard child of the two in some
fashion... I trust Martin will lob up at this point and give us the
Definitive Take of DH vs. P. (vs whomever else) phalanxes, assuming
the distinctions haven't been cross-fertilised out of existence in
the modern day. (Most of the DH ones have been explicitly re-formed
in the Lunar era, for example, IIRC.)
> "Don't let those screaming blue men and this thunderstorm un-nerve you
> men. Hold the line."
>
> -..not always so easy.
No, indeed not! What's that Zulu saying about standing at the front of a
close-order formation, short spear, brave heart?
The training and doctrine of a phalangist unit will be, in order of
descending importance, i) hold the line, ii) hold the line, and iii)
hold the line, for the very reason that it's not a natural or easy thing
to do. Having too much of a 'back-up plan' would look potentially
lukewarm, given this context...
Cheers,
Alex.
------------------------------
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : Fri 13 Jun 2003 - 21:17:14 EEST