From: Alex Ferguson (abf@cs.ucc.ie)
Date: Sat 07 Oct 2000 - 01:27:10 EEST
David Cake:
> To be completely honest, I think this abscence of a mystic
> otherworld is very overstated, anyway. For something that doesn't
> exist, we seem to know a fair bit about it (Summer Land Heaven,
> Yothbedta's Stream, etc).
> For a RW example, the Tibettans certainly spent a lot of
> effort on describing the details of the otherworld. They essentially
> believe much of it is illusionary or unimportant, but they still have
> one.
At the risk of sounding like D. Adams, what do we mean by 'mystic'?
How can we reach an empirical definition of 'otherworld'? The Kralori
certainly have heavens and hells, though they're not what they would
call "unconditioned reality", or whatever.
> I think the mystics believe that those who are not of
> sufficient mystical development definately do interact with the
> otherworld
You mean insufficiently advanced mystics, or others? And, "which"
otherworld? Not at all clear what you mean here. (About four
permutations at least...)
> I suspect that the draconic way doesn't really distinguish
> the way other cultures do - if you put enough dragons in it, the
> material world starts to become the otherworld.
That sounds rather crude, stated thusly, but I can't qualitively
improve upon it.
------------------------------
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : Fri 13 Jun 2003 - 17:19:49 EEST