From: Julian Lord (julian.lord@wanadoo.fr)
Date: Sun 05 Nov 2000 - 00:16:44 EET
Peter Metcalfe :
> > > Gloranthan Atheists believe that God is _impersonal_ rather than
> > > inaccessible.
>
> >Well, one kind of Gloranthan Atheist believes in a god or gods, even
> >though they cannot worship him/them for whatever reason, therefore
> >having no relation with him/them : impersonality and inaccessibility
> >both fine reasons IMO.
>
> Just because they consider God to be impersonal does not mean they
> are incapable of having any relationship to God.
That's a bit of a theological tail-chaser IMO : surely, by _definition_ an
impersonal god doesn't engage in personal relationships with mortals ?
> The exercise of
Indeed. What about the muckrakers, though ?
> one's Will is the sorcerer's method of establishing such relations.
My detective skills tell me there's a spectrum here,
not the duality of can-can't/'tis-'tisn't.
Julian Lord
------------------------------
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : Fri 13 Jun 2003 - 17:21:26 EEST