From: David Cake (dave@difference.com.au)
Date: Thu 14 Jun 2001 - 19:34:52 EEST
Simon H wrote:
>It was pointed out that this terminology isn't strictly necessery,
>but I think it's usefull to draw a deistinction between
>otherworlds with a transcendent aspect and those without.
To leap straight into asking difficult questions - is there a
real different between an otherworld without a transcendant aspect,
and an otherworld with no known transcendant aspect, and an
otherworld with no inhabitants with knowledge of the transcendant?
I'm kind of wondering what happens if a mystic, say, goes
visiting one of these 'short worlds', and converts one of the
inhabitants to the mystic path, and said inhabitant spends years
meditating etc. This is not out of character for some Tibettan
mystics, for example.
Cheers
David
------------------------------
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : Fri 13 Jun 2003 - 17:38:36 EEST