From: Julian Lord (julian.lord@wanadoo.fr)
Date: Sun 23 Sep 2001 - 13:36:35 EEST
<nitpick>
Peters :
> >So one assumes there is a more basic Death that Humakt himself
> >depends from.
>
> Humakt is the most primal theistic form of death. If
> there is anything higher, then it is not capable of
> theistic manifestation.
I personally disagree with both of these positions, but in a nitpicky way.
First, I don't think that there is any more basic Death that Humakt might "depend
from". He would "partake of" such an hypothetic entity rather, if it existed.
Remember : Humakt IS Death. Despite the opinion of various animists and
sorcerors. If you like, "Humakt" is the name (and magic package) that (some)
theists give to Death.
Second, I don't believe that some sort of "supra-cosmic" higher Death entity
wouldn't be capable of manifesting as a god. Which sort of ties in with my first
nitpick.
</nitpick>
I could run with this a little further, but that would be HPG-fodder, so ...
- -..
Julian Lord
------------------------------
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : Fri 13 Jun 2003 - 18:11:03 EEST