Re: "Sufficient" detail

• In hw-rules_at_egroups.com, Frank Rafaelsen <rafael_at_n...> wrote: Not improvisation, interpretation. Feats must be interpreted, and I let my players do this, within limits of course. If I've ever get a player playing an orlanth adventorous cultist I'll ask him what he thinks Sunset Leap does.

If he is completely unable to come up with an effect I'll suggest that it might be a teleport power (but only suggest). As a gm I of course have the privilege and responsibility to overrule too outlandish interpretations. What goes as good interpretations is a matter of negotiation between me and my players (as it is with all rpg rule sets, really).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Fair enough, I get your point. This works quite well if you have a stable group. If your players vary however, it is good to have a reference point. I suppose one could keep an index of mythlets/interpretations as they arise to which the players could refer, I'd still like to hear the party line however.

Steve             Received on Thu 17 Aug 2000 - 03:32:34 EEST