RE: [hw-rules] Clarifying Theistic Magic

From: Graham, Andrew <agraham_at_k20abz1aVAv3euC1q-NAhr6NNRamTJtLn5_EfRELeFG7eA0vIr4c1aidC-UdCMcRIrZ1i2v>
Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2000 15:00:38 +0100

> scenarios are
> actually a damn good place to put Feat descriptions ...
Yes the rule lawyers can take it as the whole truth and the rest can take it as how that person uses his magic.

- Received on Thu 07 Sep 2000 - 07:00:51 EEST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: JEFFREY KYER: "Re: Clarifying Theistic Magic"
Previous message: Sir Ethilrist: "Re: [hw-rules] Clarifying Combat/Extended Contests"
Maybe in reply to: Graham, Andrew: "RE: [hw-rules] Clarifying Theistic Magic"
In reply to Julian Lord: "Re: [hw-rules] Clarifying Theistic Magic"
Next in thread: Wulf Corbett: "Re: Clarifying Theistic Magic"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Fri 04 Jan 2008 - 22:51:57 EET