Humakti versus ghosts

From: Andrew Barton <AndrewBarton_at_3q6eFmwIJ1aShJ-J0mgzBKZj8pV6WqoZrG7u8LHPaIRc4GEdn0x7qnvtatAwVn2UST>
Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2000 12:12:40 -0400

> Ghost is a Dead Person who should NOT be here

I wouldn't let a Humakti use Fight Undead against a ghost. Seeing the very next feat in the affinity description is Lay Ghost, he doesn't need to.

RQ Humakti could Bind Ghosts, but that seems to have gone from the keyword writeup.

Andrew Received on Thu 07 Sep 2000 - 09:12:58 EEST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Andrew Barton: "Gold from fire"
Previous message: Tim Ellis: "Re: Augements, Target Numbers, Heads, Was: Augmenting AP?"
In reply to JEFFREY KYER: "Re: Clarifying Theistic Magic"
Next in thread: JEFFREY KYER: "Re: Humakti versus ghosts"
Reply: JEFFREY KYER: "Re: Humakti versus ghosts"
Reply: Thom Baguley: ">Subject: Humakti versus ghosts"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Fri 04 Jan 2008 - 22:51:58 EET