Re: Digest Number 297

• In hw-rules_at_egroups.com, Wulf Corbett <wulfc_at_w...> wrote:
  > On Sun, 1 Oct 2000 16:21:06 +0100, Richard Melvin
  > <rmelvin_at_r...> wrote:
  >
  > >Hmm, do you have non-illusionist PCs in your games?
  > >
  > >Do they feel perhaps a bit left out?
  >
  > We haven't even got an Illusionist yes, she's in the design stage
  :) I
  > do agree, the rules I created are powerful and open to abuse. Using
  > them to, as you say, fetch supper, would be excessive & wasteful.
  I'm
  > working on limitations & adding difficulties (like the AP
  requirement
  > when initially casting). But nonetheless I think the basic idea does
  > work.
  >
  > Wulf
  

I would point out that requiring AP expenditures forces any usage to being an extended contest or to be no penalty at all. My own opinion is that the rules are remarkably powerful and on the far side of playablity as there seems to be little downside, but I think others have (and will) comment on it...

Jeff             Received on Sun 01 Oct 2000 - 14:21:32 EEST