Re: [hw-rules] Illusions

On Tue, 3 Oct 2000 15:35:54 -0400, Andrew Barton <AndrewBarton_at_x_0Ur-XBOr9rb8a-TvZE-JPy4kQcHGtvOF4KBM1WJ-8CneSP3TujzqpSJLdakFwDRwdpKqlhMs1fg0RSzl52qAY.yahoo.invalid> wrote:

>> manipulating whole sensory inputs (like Illusory Vision)
>
>No. You're not manipulating sensory inputs at all. You're putting an
>object into the world which anyone can then sense any way they like. If an
>illusory tree falls in the forest, there -is- a sound.

Yes, that was my point, confused though I was... Sensory illusions covering whole senses are extremely difficult to control, being limited only by the illusionist's imagination, temporary reality ones, although difficult to rule on how to create, have definite abilities.

>All this seems to mean that the RQ3 Illusion spells are in fundamental
>error. So much the better, say I.

Agreed there, I never could figure them out... I still like my illusion idea, haven't seen an easier one to adjudicate yet, although it doesn't QUITE fit with Greg's comments.

Wulf             Received on Tue 03 Oct 2000 - 13:49:03 EEST