Re: [hw-rules] Ken and his sword

From: Alex Ferguson <abf_at_gQ3ptbzv6Y96Auz4cUxBc6gjgbu4peZd5_SlHbHGZ2obOyPR5-jZ09pfWEbF860brTRv0-6Wjg.>
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2001 13:56:14 +0100 (BST)

Benedict Adamson:
> A straw man. Please pay attention.

Aren't "You're constructing a straw man argument" and "you're not paying attention" incompatible accusations? (Classic tactics is to use them in rapid alternation, of course.)

Just a thought...

Cheers,
Alex. Received on Thu 25 Oct 2001 - 05:54:41 EEST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Wulf Corbett: "Re: Ken and his sword"
Previous message: Ian Cooper: "Re: Ability advancement"
Maybe in reply to: Kmnellist_at_2KFxMLbHRPElcc5MB9lHq_a_pOqow7GG1zHYQb2YKMCsTdkzL0BW40-TLlSi0wS6R_J8j: "Re: [hw-rules] Ken and his sword"
In reply to Benedict Adamson: "Re: [hw-rules] Ken and his sword"
Next in thread: Kmnellist_at_pbP0qpNbEf2HY-dzlQSkFbhewAaXW3tcU96yshLbSkO_M7YGP8-3KvZDbO2bVye9yIEgb: "Re: [hw-rules] re: Ken and his sword. (NOT ring of doom 5W4)"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Fri 04 Jan 2008 - 22:54:30 EET