Re: [hw-rules] Re: Modelling EC consequences

From: Benedict Adamson <badamson_at_Yaq1z298Mjx6ad-hVRobp7iTSo80qVBy4ZhfmQ-OiT3QsYG39BqsjhaRfuxIHxpuM7cZxd>
Date: Wed, 22 May 2002 09:06:34 +0800

Wulf Corbett wrote:
...
> The problem is, in what way can an 'Injured' result
> be applied & explained to an individual who remained out of range of
> the enemy, but lost while using his Ranged Combat to attack them?

What does it mean to be 'Injured' when the contest was a debate? Its probably best to use the terms marginal/minor/major/complete defeat terms in these cases, rather than dazed/injured/dying.             Received on Tue 21 May 2002 - 18:07:37 EEST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Fri 04 Jan 2008 - 22:55:15 EET