RQ IV comments

From: Burton Choinski (burt@ptltd.com)
Date: Fri 14 May 1993 - 18:50:02 EEST



%r rq
Oliver Jovanovic notes:
>>If you are interested in having your comments regarding RQIV taken
>>into account for the next version of the draft, posting them to the
>>Digest is not as useful as sending comments to me. I'm currently
>>collecting, summarizing and eventually passing RQIV comments on
>>to Avalon Hill and the other people working on RQIV. Sending comments
>>directly to me makes my life considerably easier than having to search
>>through digest after digest for specific comments.

Sorry 'bout that. I was unaware that I was supposed to send them direct to you. I hope you caught them...I deleted my file here. :p

>>However, Loren Miller set up a automated mailing list for RQIV playtest
>>discussion a while ago. It hasn't been active recently, but if there is
>>an interest, this might be a viable alternative.

I'm interested in being on this, if possible.

Regarding the RQ Font
>>If this doesn't work for you, I could email the font in
>>a binhexed or uuencoded format - in case you're not familiar
>>with these, they are formats that let you turn a binary file
>>(Mac .sit or IBM .zip in this case) into a string of ASCII
>>characters for transmission by email. You'd need a utility,
>>such as Stuffit on a Mac to turn it back into a binary file.
>>You'd have to let me know what sort of format you'd need.

I downloaded it, but the characters produce odd results on our printers here, with strike lines reversing color when they cross (like an XOR or something).

I'll put up my Font sometime soon, with the same character assignments as his, once I get the Air rune finished.



Joerg Baumgartner notes:
>>Burton Chodinski on RQ4
>>What draft do you refer to? My ersion is draft 2.0 (thanks again, Argant),
>>yours seems to be different. Else I haven't noticed the reusability of
>>1-point Runespells for high initiates...

We must have the same version. That comment was not in mine, I just echoed wa suggestion that someone else here suggested.


This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : Fri 10 Oct 2003 - 01:30:47 EEST