From: johnjmedway (jjm@zycor.lgc.com)
Date: Fri 01 Oct 1993 - 20:27:26 EET
Robert McArthur:
>> I think it's because Ettyries, to gain the spells and benefits of Issaries,
>> had to go on a hero/god-quest and followed in Issaries footsteps for everything
>> Issaries did. Except that Ettyries was Illuminated while doing so. Thus,
>> every stricture except for those relating to chaos that Issaries has, Ettyries
>> has.
joerg:
>> Your Illumination reasoning doesn't work, why else could illuminated
>> Humakti or Yelmalions ignore their geasa without negative consequences,
>> which have nothing to do with chaos?
>>
>> A possible explanation to this might be that while Etyries WAS
>> illuminated, this priest wasn't, so that he has to follow the
>> strictures his deity could ignore.
If interpreted loosely, this could also imply than until illuminated, a worshipper of Yanafal Tarnils, could not be resurrected; a Irripi Ontor priest would have to wear a beard, etc.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : Fri 10 Oct 2003 - 01:31:48 EEST