rule quest

Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

From: Newton Hughes (C442196@MIZZOU1.missouri.edu)
Date: Tue 05 Oct 1993 - 20:40:44 EET

WARNING: Rulesy stuff ahead; philosopher kings avert thy eyes

Pendragon Traits in RQ:
While I'm not as appalled at the possibility of introducing Pendragon traits, I don't think I'd welcome it either. It was interesting to see the Pendragon Pass traits table, though.

Eric Johnson-Debaufre's mounted combat question: If the Uroxi sees the Zebra rider coming he should get a chance to swing at him, regardless of DEX.

This is the sort of thing I mean when I refer to the SR rules as buggy; see also David Cheng's comments archived at soda in the discussions, about people casting spells in melee. I vote for eliminating Strike Ranks altogether (but not going the way of Elric! either). Even if you love SRs you should be prepared to bend the rules considerably to make them fit.

Just a side note about rq3 move rates: if you add 5 to the rq3 m/sr figure you get a good approximation of the rq2 move rate.

Newton

Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : Fri 10 Oct 2003 - 01:31:49 EEST