Re: 1-H Weapons

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: Mike Strong (mstrong@cix.compulink.co.uk)
Date: Fri 15 Oct 1993 - 14:54:47 EET

Next message: Geoff Gunner: "RQ4"
Previous message: Colin Watson: "GMing vs GLing"
In reply to: Colin Watson: "spirit battles; SRs; swords"
Next in thread: scn/G=Neil/I=NA/S=Harold/O=Siemens_plc/OU1=Congleton@mhs.attmail.com: "1-H Swords are useful!"
Reply: scn/G=Neil/I=NA/S=Harold/O=Siemens_plc/OU1=Congleton@mhs.attmail.com: "1-H Swords are useful!"

In-Reply-To: <9310150615.AA12932@glorantha.Holland.Sun.COM> Colin Watson comments:

>concerned about how crap 1-H swords are []. The only advantage I can
>see...It makes me wonder how swords ever became popular

Well, one handed weapons do let you use shields effectively - and shields can be jolly useful...

Mike

Next message: Geoff Gunner: "RQ4"
Previous message: Colin Watson: "GMing vs GLing"
In reply to: Colin Watson: "spirit battles; SRs; swords"
Next in thread: scn/G=Neil/I=NA/S=Harold/O=Siemens_plc/OU1=Congleton@mhs.attmail.com: "1-H Swords are useful!"
Reply: scn/G=Neil/I=NA/S=Harold/O=Siemens_plc/OU1=Congleton@mhs.attmail.com: "1-H Swords are useful!"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : Fri 10 Oct 2003 - 01:31:55 EEST