From: Geoff Gunner (eosgg@raesp-farn.mod.uk)
Date: Fri 03 Dec 1993 - 21:06:06 EET
Joerg writes about getting some serious activity done on compiling RQ material.
If it's already in publication, then just reference it if it's a substantial body of info. Otherwise, what's the copyright on paraphrasing (like getting an ACCURATE timeline from all the sources ?).
I think that would be a damn good place to start. A timeline's possibly one of the most useful bits of reference material out. Look at the contradictions in what we've already got. It would show us what sort of problems are likely to crop up, how to go about accumulating data, how to edit responsibly, how to ultimately resolve contradictions, and so on. Anyone for it ?
And interesting point there about 'Do we need Greg Stafford's approval'. Yup, it would be nice, but it seems Greg's trying to get out of being the ultimate authority. So why not respect that, and become a *Democracy* (Whoever shouts loudest, wins) ?
So - what's the other strength of feeling out there ?
Geoff.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : Fri 10 Oct 2003 - 01:32:33 EEST