From: Anthony Ragan (ECZ5RAR@MVS.OAC.UCLA.EDU)
Date: Sat 02 Apr 1994 - 03:27:00 EEST
Hi all,
(Sorry to post this here, but I don't get the RQ4 group and since the letters were cross-posted here.....:>)
Like most of us, I don't know why Greg denied approval of RQ:AiG -- I hope the matter gets sorted out soon and then we can all look forward to the Glorious Reascent of Runequest. :>
This crisis gives all concerned a chance to reassess the kind of product we'd like to see so, with the hope of having a bit of influence, let me throw in my two bolgs' worth:
What I as a consumer would like to see is a simplified RQ based on Basic Roleplay, a la Call of Cthulhu or Elric. (I think Loren proposed something similar as RQ Lite) I don't think anyone will deny that these are elegant games. The more bookkeeping-intensive elements could be kept in an appendix to be added in modular fashion by those who like them.
2) Write the rule book in such a way that those of us who don't want to play in Glorantha will have an easy time adapting it to our own preferred settings. Don't get me wrong, Glorantha is a marvellous setting, just not my preferred place to play. Wouldn't it be possible to have a core rules section and then a section/supplement that explains how to adapt these very flexible rules to the Gloranthan setting? I know some people will scream that "RQ is *nothing* without Glorantha!" I respectfully disagree. I think that RQ could very well be a successful general fantasy game, with Glorantha being its special, but not only world.
Well, that's all I wanted to say.More than anything else, though, I'd like to see this dispute settled and work on RQ4 re-commenced with renewed enthusiasm.
cheers!
--Anthony Ragan
ecz5rar@mvs.oac.ucla.edu -OR- IrishSpy@aol.com
Rune Chia Pet of Ernalda, Snotling in Chief
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : Fri 10 Oct 2003 - 01:33:32 EEST