Western Women -- A more Egalitarian Loskalm

From: Michelle Ringo (Michelle_Ringo@ed.gov)
Date: Fri 01 Jul 1994 - 17:39:25 EEST


          Thanks to all of you who have kindly thought to name a
          Rokari Saint after me.  I agree that it should be a
          "Gloranthan" name, if done at all.

          I would like to put forth my argument for why
          Hrestoli/Loskalmi are more egalatarian than other Western
          cultures.

          I agree that Book 3 of the Genertela Books under Western
          Soldier does state that under "Gender Relations" Western
          culture is dominated by patriarchal structures, paternal
          ancestors, etc.  Men are the rulers, highest church
          authorities, warriors and hard workers. Women are the child
          bearers and hearth keepers.  However, this does not
          preclude strong roles for women.  "Dominated by" is not
          the same as exclusively.  Even Seshnela has female
          enchantresses.

          Under Loskalm in Genertela Book 2, Page 19: "The old and
          respected kingdom is rich, stable and confident of its
          future  The _unusual_ meritocracy based on a revival of
          Hrestoli beliefs [whatever those may be], has produced a
          _fair and integrated_ society . . . cities thrive, . . . ."
          Meritocracy is a system by which advancement is based on
          achievements, or ability.  Leadership by talented achievers
          (per Webster's II New Riverside University Dictionary).
          This is not implicitly a gender biased approach to
          advancement.

          I would argue that Loskalm has the traditional
          gender roles (like all the other cultures described
          throughout the Genertela books), but also like the Lunars,
          Orlanthis et al, has men and women both switching roles, and
          not all roles are gender specific.

          Wizardry, Sorcery, Priesthood would not be gender specific.
          One of the differences in Hrestoli based worship amongst the
          wizards (unlike the Seshnela wizards) is that they "do not
          rail against the common pleasures, nor threaten loss of
          Solace for feeling no guilt over love and hunger".  This
          moves further away from a celibate priest/monk approach of
          the Catholic church.

          My interest in all of this comes out of the fact that the
          Kingdom of War vs Loskalm clash looks interesting for gaming
          within.  Thus far, I would not run a female PC in the
          Kingdom of War, but I could see strong women PCs and NPCs
          coming out of the Loskalmi culture.  Varying in type from
          St. Joan of Arc, Queen Elizabeth II, Queen Eleanor of
          Acquitain, Catherine de Medici, Fighting Nuns of Saint
          Myshella.  There is not dicta that women can not be members
          of the Order of the Red Garter and the Order of the Swallow.
          Yes, history of the Loskalmi reflect that only men have been
          Kings and Heads of these Orders.  Analagously, the USA has
          no prohibition against a woman president, but simply has not
          had one elected to date.  Until Margaret Thatcher the UK was
          in the same situation.  That which has not happened is not
          per se forbidden.

          I would see the women warriors of Loskalm as using archery
          of a type other than the crossbow and as using spear in a
          melee situation.  From a sociological perspective if a
          culture has a warrior class to which women can be are
          expected to aspire to, the proper physicality and aggression
          can be developed.

          Another possibility for women roles in this area are as
          merchants, auxilarly support to the war machines of either
          side, part of a subversive underground movement for peace in
          the Kingdom of War.  Nevertheless, at least one side of this
          conflict should be fairly attractive to PCs of both genders.
From: RuneQuest-Request@Glorantha.Holland.Sun.COM (RQ Digest Maintainer) To: RuneQuest@Glorantha.Holland.Sun.COM (Daily automated RQ-Digest) Reply-To: RuneQuest@Glorantha.Holland.Sun.COM (RuneQuest Daily) Subject: RuneQuest Daily, Sat, 02 Jul 1994, part 3 Sender: Henk.Langeveld@Holland.Sun.COM
Content-Return: Prohibited
Precedence: junk

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : Fri 10 Oct 2003 - 01:35:39 EEST