Communal Rune-magic

From: Peter J. Whitelaw (100102.3001@compuserve.com)
Date: Sun 14 Aug 1994 - 15:29:56 EEST

• Next message: Urox@aol.com: "Soloquest"
• Previous message: Peter Metcalfe, CAPE Canty: "The Blue Wizard goes forth"
• In reply to: Peter Metcalfe, CAPE Canty: "Communal Rune Magic."
• Next in thread: Colin Watson: "Re: Communal Rune Magic"

Hi all,

Peter Metcalfe makes a proposal:
>Colin watson wrote
>
>>What we need is a new magic system for non-personal communal divine magic.
>
>I like this idea and have a proposeal which should keep changes minimal.
>
>My idea is this:

[fine idea follows]

>Comments?
>
>Peter Metcalfe

Since Peter Metcalfe and I are, in fact, the same person, I obviously like this idea.

I would think that some gearing ought to be introduced for non-reusable spells, though. Perhaps they might cost twice or three times as many of the pool points.

And would you number Associated Cult spells as being amongst those available? I suggest that they should not be.

All the best,

Peter Whitelaw/Metcalfe/Whoever...

• Next message: Urox@aol.com: "Soloquest"
• Previous message: Peter Metcalfe, CAPE Canty: "The Blue Wizard goes forth"
• In reply to: Peter Metcalfe, CAPE Canty: "Communal Rune Magic."
• Next in thread: Colin Watson: "Re: Communal Rune Magic"

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : Fri 10 Oct 2003 - 01:36:23 EEST