From: Alex Ferguson (alex@dcs.gla.ac.uk)
Date: Mon 15 Aug 1994 - 19:57:52 EEST
Peter Metcalfe:
> As
> Zzabur was not part of the First Council (Eric Rowe can correct me on this:
> Is Zzabur a particpant in "the broken council LARP"?), It follows that
> Zzabur was not a particpant of the I fought we won battle. How to explain
> the discrepancy inside Glorantha ?
But IFWW wasn't a pitched battle at all, so who "participated" is a hazy question. Even if it is a Genuine Universal Myth and not a God Learner Stitch Up, as it is, by definition, in each case an individual facing and defeating chaos alone, who would be able to tell, GL theories aside, who was "really" there?
> 1) The God Learners were confused (again!).
Probably. One could wonder about this sort of thing in other cases too; is Alone in Hell an instance of the IFWW? Discuss. Use only one side of the paper.
> 2) Zzabur was bragging as usual.
Natch.
ANDOVER@delphi.com:
> So at the present time, the position
> in Great Britain is as follows: the Episcopal Church is established
> in England, the Presbyterians in Scotland, and there is no established
> church in Wales and Northern Ireland.
It's been a while since I was booted out to the CoS, but last time I checked, they were _not_ the Established Church in Scotland. However, they were formerly. Mind you, I think this depends on how you define "established" in any case; the CoS was never Established to anything like the degree to which the CoE still is. (Bishops in the House of Lords, etc.)
Michael C. Morrison attempts to Greg everyone using conflicting definitions of "Greg": ;-) ;-)
> GREG (v): 1. To prove one's own theories or disprove competing theories
> by citing (usually) unpublished writings of Greg Stafford.
[...]
Trouble is, none of these seem to cover Greg Gregging people, which is after all the origin of the term, if not its most common use...
Alex.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : Fri 10 Oct 2003 - 01:36:24 EEST