Put the Moose topic in the Red Data Book.

From: Alex Ferguson (alex@dcs.gla.ac.uk)
Date: Sun 04 Sep 1994 - 05:21:18 EEST


Sandy:
> Alex:
> >Joerg and I can both claim to have cohabited, country-wise, with
> >_Alces alces_
> really? What country? I know there's none in Scotland or
> mainland Germany.

Sweden. (In my case, at least.) Not that downtown Go:teborg is a major migration route, exactly.

> >But _Cervus canadensis_ isn't _that_ much bigger, is it?

> 1) it's not universally agreed to be a separate species from
> C. elaphus.

I've only seen one source that says any different (though others mention the same-species as an Opposing Theory). At any rate, referring to wapiti as C. elaphus, without (sub)species distinction, when speaking _exclusively_ about them (e.g. how little we europeans evidently know about them) is non-useful.

I've also seen a reference which claims moose are a distinct species from the (eurasian) elk, come to that, which I feel I should mention in case this raises any qualms about relabelling them all en moose masse.

> Unless stimulated to further action by needling beyond endurance, I
> plan to cease posting about the great Elk controversy.

No, no, Great Elk are something _completely_ different, aren't they?

Alex.
From: RuneQuest-Request@Glorantha.Holland.Sun.COM (RQ Digest Maintainer) To: RuneQuest@Glorantha.Holland.Sun.COM (Daily automated RQ-Digest) Reply-To: RuneQuest@Glorantha.Holland.Sun.COM (RuneQuest Daily) Subject: RuneQuest Daily, Sun, 04 Sep 1994, part 2 Sender: Henk.Langeveld@Holland.Sun.COM
Content-Return: Prohibited
Precedence: junk



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : Fri 10 Oct 2003 - 01:36:44 EEST