Backing Paul, Re: Arkati and Illumination.

From: Jonas Schiott (jonas.schiott@vinga.hum.gu.se)
Date: Tue 18 Oct 1994 - 21:09:37 EET



> Paul Reilly here.
>
> Well, apparently there is a dispute about the origins of the Presence/Vessel
>system. Will people who saw it on the RQ4 list back in the first half
>of 1993 back me up?

I've seen it in the RQ4 list archives. You definitely have priority for the _terminology_. As for mechanics, I can't comment, not having read any of the umpteen proposed sorcery systems very closely.



Alex -

>(CoT, to be picky)

Slip of the mind...

>What Greg seems to think is that the cults of the Dark Empire, and perhaps
>some of the latter-day Arkat cults, had their own "system of information"
>which was like Illumination in some ways (such as ability to detect
>Illuminates, I'm tempted to guess)

Philosophy classes on "Sophistic Gbaji Rhetoric, and How To Refute It"?

>he seems to be rethinking Pelorian idea on illumination, pouring scorn
>on all existing and any possible future rules for illumination (et al),
>and is being very quiet about Arkat cults in the 3rd age.

Oh good, that means I can ignore them a while longer. :-)

>You seemed to be saying, rather, that "some Illuminates might not be either
>Dark-siders or Light-siders".

Yes?

>What I'm suggesting is that it's basically a
>philosophical distinction, and trying to classify individuals by it is a
>bit pointless.

Whoa, that's deep! ;-) You mean you refuse to classify individuals according to their philosophical beliefs? Or do you mean by "philosophical" that the distinction is purely _technical_; only names the end points of a spectrum, or is only applicable to the 'atomary' components of a belief structure?

(      Jonas Schiott                                   )
(      Institutionen for Ide- och lardomshistoria      )
(      Goteborgs Universitet                           )


---------------------


This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : Fri 10 Oct 2003 - 01:37:21 EEST