From: JOVANOVIC@CUCCFA.CCC.COLUMBIA.EDU
Date: Fri 18 Jun 1993 - 22:36:52 EEST
Actually, Nick, I was referring to the damage bonus table in the
RQIV draft (at least the first one), which had an error in its high
end - I wasn't talking about your table, which I think is fine
(as a simplifying assumption). Frankly, I like the idea of simply
adding a straight damage bonus - if you're going to change damage
bonus so that it is smoother than the old system, might as well make
it simpler to use at the same time.
Oliver
0,,
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : Sat 05 Jul 2003 - 20:27:57 EEST