From: Wayne Shaw (shadow@qedbbs.com)
Date: Thu 12 Aug 1993 - 14:06:33 EEST
gal502@cscgpo.anu.edu.au (Graeme A Lindsell) writes:
>
> One thing I've realized from this mailing list is not only does
> no-one seem to play the standard RQIII rules, but there doesn't
> seem to be very much of a consensus as to what people don't like,
> outside of a general dislike of the fatigue rules: some people
> even like the sorcery rules (bizarre!). A collection of optional
> rules might be a fairly useful way of collecting the best of the
> house rules that the many players use. I'm not advocating that
> RQIV be abandoned, but I think it needs a longer gestation period,
Kind of the reason I'm somewhat behind Loren on this. I'd rather get
Has anyone actually heard anything OFFICIAL on the status of the project,
Wayne
SOMETHING out than spend the next two years determining what we even want
to do. (By the way, if I was the reference to liking the sorcery
rules...not really, I just don't consider the current ones an altogether
acceptable fix).
by the way? I haven't seen any mail in two weeks, and get the feeling
I've missed something.
------------------------------
shadow@qedbbs.com (Wayne Shaw) or qed!shadow
The QED BBS -- (310)420-9327
0,,
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : Sat 05 Jul 2003 - 20:28:43 EEST