Re: Is the rulers the real issue

From: Loren J. Miller (MILLERL@wharton.upenn.edu)
Date: Wed 01 Sep 1993 - 23:22:51 EEST


I agree that the rules aren't the most important part of the RQ
renaissance, but they are the focus of this list. I'd prefer to see
the rules discussions stay here instead of filling up the digest,
which I'd prefer to see concentrating on Glorantha and on finished
rules ideas, rather than incomplete ideas.

That's also why I think we can afford to spend time on this list
working out rules variants. Also, if you are against RQ Lite then just
ignore the RQ Lite postings. They're marked well enough. I think there

are enough people on this list to support two development efforts, one
for RQ Lite and one for RQ4-big-and-hairy, and don't think that our
discussion is in danger of losing steam because of fragmentation. In
other words, if the idea of RQ Lite just makes you want to puke then
keep your feelings to yourself. Participate in a positive way or not
at all.

Somebody could lose an eye...

That's enough soapbox oratory for now.

whoah,
+++++++++++++++++++++++23
Loren Miller internet: MILLERL@wharton.upenn.edu
"Science" does not remove the terror of the gods.

0,,


This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : Sat 05 Jul 2003 - 20:29:32 EEST