From: johnjmedway (jjm@zycor.lgc.com)
Date: Wed 10 Nov 1993 - 02:35:32 EET
Nick Brooke:
>> >> Does *anyone* prefer the "generic" RQ3 products
>> >> to the Gloranthan ones? What should we be designing rules to encourage?
They work fairly well for Tekumel, but I've not played anywhere in
Glorantha where I've felt that they would be appropriate.
David Dunham:
>> I do encourage the use of Glorantha as an example world. I'd like to see
>> rules that aren't intimately tied to Glorantha, however. For one thing,
>> Glorantha itself varies widely. RQ3's "pennies" in some ways make more
>> sense than RQ2's Lunars (even tho it was stated that other lands used
>> different coins).
This is opening up the how many sorcery systems do we want debate.
We probably need two, at least. We need one that is compatible with RQ3,
*if* RQ4 is to be compatible with RQ3 scenarios. We also need one that
feels like it belongs.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
| john_medway@zycor.lgc.com | Landmark Graphics Corp | 512.292.2325 |
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
0,,
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : Sat 05 Jul 2003 - 20:30:24 EEST