From: Loren J. Miller (MILLERL@wharton.upenn.edu)
Date: Tue 04 Jan 1994 - 18:21:18 EET
David Cake <davidc@cs.uwa.oz.au> writes:
> Actually, I would just say that Chaosium produced stuff is higher quality than
> Avalon Hill produced.
Up until the recent stuff I'd say you were right. But I think that the
RQ Renaissance stuff stands up to the Chaosium produced stuff pretty
well. Anyway, I think that it's quite possible for RQ products to be
great no matter where they are set. The problem was in the editing and
in AH and Chaosium's committment to RQ and its settings, which was not
enough. You just can't fairly compare a RQ module edited by Nick Atlas
to one that Ken Rolston and/or Sandy Petersen and/or Greg Stafford
revised and edited. It's like comparing a chicken to a greyhound.
whoah,
+++++++++++++++++++++++23
Loren Miller internet: MILLERL@wharton.upenn.edu
"Enough sound bites. Let's get to work." -- Ross Perot sound bite
0,,
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : Sat 05 Jul 2003 - 20:30:57 EEST