From: David Dunham (ddunham@radiomail.net)
Date: Tue 11 Jan 1994 - 21:55:20 EET
>I assessed RQ3 as RULES and found it lacking. Thinking about the rules
>that I like I rejected the publication. My perspective was that I had a good
>enough rule system in RQ2 and RQ3 did not add anything worth while. However
>I did decide that the Magic Book was worth picking up and subsequently bought
>a second hand copy.
For what it's worth, I think some of the best stuff is in book 3. And if
you're a Glorantha-phile, you'd need book 5 for the Cult of Ernalda.
>I would love to assess RQIV and but I believe that it is unethical for
>me to pull the RQIV 2nd draft by ftp and read it without permission of
>the company involved. I have applied to playtest the latest release.
Wasn't it explicitly posted to an ftp site by the authors?
David Dunham * Software Designer * Pensee Corporation
Voice/Fax: 206 783 7404 * AppleLink: DDUNHAM * Internet: ddunham@radiomail.net
"I say we should listen to the customers and give them what they want."
"What they want is better products for free." --Scott Adams
0,,
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : Sat 05 Jul 2003 - 20:31:10 EEST