Ceremony ...

From: johnjmedway (jjm@zycor.lgc.com)
Date: Wed 26 Jan 1994 - 08:40:04 EET


Hey, I know I'm behind, O.K.?

>> From: David Dunham <ddunham@radiomail.net>
>> Date: Thu, 20 Jan 1994 22:37:01 PST
>>
>> I think it's a bad idea to add <type> to Ceremony, Enchant, and Summon. I
>> understand that they probably are slightly different, but it's not likely
>> to come up in average play (except perhaps for Ceremony), yet it's a

I think it is a very good idea to split ceremony into Ceremony<Cult> or
Ceremony<Type>. In fact, it makes more sense to me to do that, than to
split the weapons into as many categories as there are..

Example:

Balaal din Sumua, ex-Priest of Irripi Ontor has Ceremony<I.O.> of 90%.
After being defrocked, he joins Danfive Xaron.

Other than the fact that they are both of the 7Mothers, why should any
great ammount of knowledge about religious ceremony transfer?
What if the changeover was from Orlanth to Thanatar? ( extreme, I know )

This one definitely needs to be differentiated.

As for Enchant and Summon ...

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
| john_medway@zycor.lgc.com | Landmark Graphics Corp | 512.292.2325 |
---------------------------------------------------------------------------


0,,


This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : Sat 05 Jul 2003 - 20:32:05 EEST